Is there a ‘right’ way to cover terrorism?

Is there a ‘right’ way to cover terrorism?

This week, news managers from Pakistan’s eight major private television channels voluntarily met to generate guidelines to govern media coverage of terrorism. The initiative was in response to public criticism of the independent media, which has been broadcasting increasingly graphic and disturbing images live from the scenes of terror attacks.

The representatives of the media outlets have agreed to show less gory images and to utilise a time-delay mechanism during live coverage so that producers can monitor content being broadcast. Shots of injured or emotionally distressed people will also be selected with due caution. In the event of live coverage of hostage situations, the channel managers decided to take necessary steps to ensure that no footage broadcast could help the hostage-takers or endanger the lives of hostages in captivity. There was also a unanimous call for improved reporter and camera crew training.

However, many Pakistanis believe this is a case of too little, too late.

Writing to Dawn.com, Sohail Abdullah asks:

Isn’t it too late now to restrict the airing of grahic content covering terrorism? In my humble opinion, graphic content, which we as a nation are quite accustomed to, is not restricted to [the aftermath] of a terrorist attack. Whether it is a Lollywood flick, front page of national newspapers, especially in local languages, we are exposed to the deceased after bad accidents, at crime scenes etc. All of these fall in the same category. No one in this country is bothered about a lot of things. Type Pakistan in your favourite web search engine and every single page shows horrific pictures from our homeland.

Do you think Pakistanis have been desensitised to images of violence and terrorism? Has the media addressed the matter of terrorism coverage too late? Can these measures help respect the dignity and privacy of Pakistanis who fall victim to terror attack? Or are such measures a form of censorship or media manipulation?

The following reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.





41 Comments »

  1. avatar comment-top

    While I am for media’s freedom but at the same time there are some irritations when the newscasters asks their reporters in the field the silly questions which gives an impression that channels representative at a certain location is a controller of everything what is happening and that he should answer all those questions for which he does not yet or have no answers. For instance, if five people have been killed, are the hospitals ready to receive dead bodies, are the hospital staff on duty, is government agencies taking action and so on. How can you expect that a reporter of the channels is more powerful and informed of everything, like he is more than the law enforcement agencies as he demonstrates he knows everything. This is hypocrisy and misleading, Media has to be realistic and the anchors or newscasters should ask relevant questions.

    Some media people seem to be pro or against some political parties. So there are lot of contradictions that media should look into for the benefit of the audience.

    comment-bottom
  2. avatar comment-top

    We need more freelance journalism to air the truth of what’s happening in Pakistan, and show the world what attrocities the Pakistan goverment continues to impose on the people of Waziristan through the Pakistan led, American war on terror.

    comment-bottom
  3. avatar comment-top

    Media should be free to publish/broadcast whatever helps them perform their professional duties within the legal framework regarding privacy and national security etc. If some segment contains something that they think some viewers might find offensive they should post a warning to that effect before airing that segment.

    Viewers always have the choice to not watch what they don’t want to.

    comment-bottom
  4. avatar
    Ibrahim Raja, Stockholm Sweden Says:
    November 18th, 2009 at 3:13 pm
    comment-top

    Media should be transparent, honest, daring and focused on Islamic Republic of Pakistan not “like Pakistan first”.

    comment-bottom
  5. avatar comment-top

    Media should cover terrorism in a manner that focuses on the victims and their long term suffering.

    comment-bottom
  6. avatar
    Owais U. Khan Says:
    November 17th, 2009 at 11:18 am
    comment-top

    Personally I am in favor of freedom of media, media should be free to cover all hidden things which are needed to disclose because in Pakistan we hide all things, Yes media should not use such painful movement for their publicity (few channels always make stories rather to broadcast simple incident report) also there should be a cautioned warning before showing painful images like dead body, wounded peoples so that people who don’t want to be upset may change channel.

    comment-bottom
  7. avatar
    A.A.Qureshi Says:
    November 17th, 2009 at 8:47 am
    comment-top

    The freedom of media to use it in positive purposes for the betterment of the country is the right way.

    The problems will remain always and to tackle them is responsibility of the state. To safe guard the community and territory is also for the government. It is good not to publicize the thinking of the enemies of the country. Whoever wants to destroy the country is enemy. Better to focus attention on economic, educational, and community development matters. Focus on constructive and positive matters.

    comment-bottom
  8. avatar
    Muhammad Akhter, Phularwan (Sargodha) Says:
    November 16th, 2009 at 8:00 pm
    comment-top

    My honorable friends Mr. Chandra from India and Mr. Akmal Ijaz and many others have stressed on the point that Media is creating violence in act of terrorism. Friends it means that every thing which is shown is creating violence. You all must keep in mind the benefits of media for example Judiciary movement. Every one forgets the role of the western media.

    comment-bottom
  9. avatar
    Ahmad, Germany Says:
    November 15th, 2009 at 3:25 pm
    comment-top

    Generally it is believed that in the Western countries the press has more freedom. During my very long stay in Germany, if have found that this is not true. In Germany, if you write just a Letter to the Editor, your letter would not be published. Similarly the Letters are not published in American Magazines and Newspapers, if you just slightly criticize the Jewish Lobby in the US. So the press freedom is just a farce. The people in Pakistan are being betrayed by the foreign ratings. Do not believe all publications and ratings of the Western media.

    comment-bottom
  10. avatar comment-top

    When showing distressing images like corpse, viewer should be cautioned so that those people who may not want to be distressed may turn off TV or change channel.

    comment-bottom
  11. avatar
    Chandra-India Says:
    November 13th, 2009 at 12:21 pm
    comment-top

    Not sure about Pakistani TV but in India, news channels repeatedly broadcasting the terror news (of India or Pakistan or elsewhere) throughout the day-same clips again and again. I am sure, it would be similar in Pakistan. This is surely spreading hatred environment against terrorism however people are more freighted as well. This kind of coverage gives terrorist some more confidence to kill more innocent people and create an environment where people become afraid of going out.

    We need to learn from the mentality of the foreign media people. They show the news once or twice of such incidence and then stops coverage. Our Media has to change its way of covering such fateful events and also the viewers should stops following those coverages again and again.
    Moreover, its the people who takes such news with utmost importance. Their is an urgency to show the maturity on how to take such new within our community/family and pass on information to the younger generation so that they get a fair understanding on what is right and what is wrong.

    comment-bottom
  12. avatar comment-top

    Pakistani Media committed lot many mistakes, being newcomers, not used to independence of media , corporate interests and some time vested interest. Some time the anchors promote a certain political line. On account of terrorism, they kept the nation divided and initially gave lot of coverage to the terrorists ideology. Some channels were trying to project terrorists as hero’s. Thanks to the bold action of Army, political parties the real face of the terrorists was unveiled.

    comment-bottom
  13. avatar
    Perdeep Kumar Says:
    November 12th, 2009 at 6:04 pm
    comment-top

    I also Prefer media will be free to cover all hidden things which is necessary to disclose because in our country we hide all things even death toll rates in any bomb blast or an accident. This is not fair.

    Everyone has right to move freely. Specially tell us what we are doing? it would be right or wrong. I think its best policy to save our democracy.

    comment-bottom
  14. avatar comment-top

    The world knows very well the conspiracy against the state. Inshaallah all types of conspiracy will be defeated in the long run and Pakistan will emerge as a peaceful state and Pakistani’s as a peace loving nation, showing due respect to all, irrespective of religion, creed, caste and language.
    god bless all. lets hope for the best.

    comment-bottom
  15. avatar comment-top

    I think media should be given free access to what is happening in Waziristan. It is the only hope for the people to know the real situation. Our country has a long history of misleading the public. That is the reason why we are very unrealistic and get into one mess after the other. Let us know what the army is doing or not doing. How many innocents have been killed or are missing. Let us know first hand what the people of Waziristan and Balochistan want. Otherwise it will be too late to handle the situation later. I feel we will end up with an unavoidable civil war.

    comment-bottom
  16. avatar
    Muhammad Ilyas Says:
    November 10th, 2009 at 9:41 pm
    comment-top

    The media is not sincere with the people who loose their lives in terrorism nor it is sincere with the relatives of the victims. For proof I say that media shows the scenes of a bomb blast, in which so many people are killed and so many are wounded. But after a few seconds you see and listen music from your television. I reveals that media is showing these scenes only as advertisement. Why we people have not dare to speak or listen the facts.

    comment-bottom
  17. avatar
    andyloubenqiang Says:
    November 9th, 2009 at 12:55 pm
    comment-top

    Support Pakistan to finish taliban, your country will get the victory, as a friend of Pakistani people, I chinese here wish you good luck

    comment-bottom
  18. avatar comment-top

    My Pakistani Brothers,

    We feel very sorry about your loss and wishes you luck for all your efforts to eliminate terrorism.
    I believe, Media plays vital role in uniting people and informing the fellow country men about the facts. I recalled couple of interviews of President Musharraf about defending Taliban and seperating them from al-qaida. Now we all know what Taliban stands for.
    We are all with you and wish that the brother we lost in partition shines again. We know you can do it !! God bless you all and long live Pakistan.

    Regards
    Your Brother

    comment-bottom
  19. avatar
    Inayat Hussain Turi Says:
    November 8th, 2009 at 8:19 pm
    comment-top

    Yes it is too late but very wise act. I still remember the footage of Islamabad sucide attack in PPP Rally in favour of chief justice in which Dr Israr Shah was crying in pain for help and the media covering the scene, was exploiting the situations. It was so agonizing that we lost confidence in so called free media. Freedom with out responsibilty is nothing more then blackmailing

    comment-bottom
  20. avatar
    Muhammad Akhter 0300-6063425 Phularwan (Sargodha) Says:
    November 8th, 2009 at 1:43 pm
    comment-top

    Dear friends! we all are here to debate on the subjected title.
    I think there is a very simple and perfect way to get ride of the terrorism. We just will have to play our national role like; 1. We should become very carefull
    2. We will have to remove all inferiorties of those people they are doing this all.
    3. Our Society (We) must finish the un-merit policies.
    4. Justice for all must not be our moto but the act also.
    5. We should not blame to media or any other for this all because they are showing us the truth. My all honorable friends stressed on this point that media is increasing terrorism attacks becuase they show everything. It does not mean that who is watching the media.
    Pray for Pakistan and be honst in your professions. Take care all of you.

    comment-bottom
  21. avatar comment-top

    The reporting must not leak critical information to the wrong doers. This is a very good step taken by the media giants in Pakistan. Media has so far played a very important role in Pakistan.

    I would also like to point out here, that a petition must be signed and foreign media channels must also be forced to not display this cirtical information on their website while reporting. It often seems as if they are trying to actually aid the wrong-doers by telling them that the Army is coming from these three directions and have passed this many miles into this city, for instance.

    Those who want news, like me, are sufficed by knowing that we have acquired an important base “after acquiring it” not at every step while acquiring it. Anyone that gives more than this information is not doing any good to our armed forces who are losing lives so that we can stay in peace.

    Long Live Pakistan.
    Long Live Pakistan Army.

    comment-bottom
  22. avatar
    Nadeem Khan Says:
    November 8th, 2009 at 1:24 am
    comment-top

    These attacks are to terrorize people. Reporting these attacks is fine as long as people who are fighting terrorism are projected as heroes; people died as victims of a crime and people who have committed this act as criminals. It is very simple.

    When media believes in neutrality while reporting terrorism and shows them as simply a conflict between two parties then terrorists try to claim success by attacking more. I believe that Media is more responsible for current situation in Pakistan than anyone else.

    Media has the power to change people mind, why media has not done enough to inform people of this terror and rallied them against such terrorism.

    Most people follow and not lead. When Media decides to stay neutral, most people who are simply follower, are now confused and there is a debate on who is right – which seemed to be the case in Pakistan.

    comment-bottom
  23. avatar comment-top

    I would say, this is a very good step.

    Mostly our media acts so immature, leaking such a sensitive information sometimes to the world making other nations of the world laugh at us.

    It seems as if there is nothing of the “kind” patriotism in our media. Western media replicates its country’s foreign polices. But our media!!!!

    I have stopped watching Pakistani News Channels. They are just full of depression and nothing else.

    Malik Akif
    Canada

    comment-bottom
  24. avatar
    Raja Afzal Rehman Khan Says:
    November 7th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
    comment-top

    Graphic images is a minor issue. What needs to be done is to STOP and PREVENT the independent media spreading WRONG and INCORRECT information and baseless RUMORS and perceptions that spread like wild fire and non-sense that people tend to believe.

    There is so much non-sense and misunderstanding among the general public that no one knows the reality anymore. Everyone is ASSUMING and making up judgments based on non-sense and zero facts!

    THIS HAS TO STOP!

    comment-bottom
  25. avatar comment-top

    We want to know what is happening in our border now. Media should get access to the South Wazirstan and expose the matter. I am sure 100’s of civilians are being killed along with the militants as its impossible to distinguish militans and villagers since Militants dont wear uniform and hide in the settlement. How it is possible only the militants get killed and no army men ?. We must know what is happening to our soldiers as well. There is a big humanitarian situation being covered up by the government for vested interests. Media should be free and unbiased so should be the coverage.

    comment-bottom
  26. avatar
    Ahmed Jamil Khan Says:
    November 7th, 2009 at 1:05 pm
    comment-top

    Mr Waqs there is no suggestion that truth not be told. Truth is truth and it cannot be moderated under any guidelines either Islamic or otherwise. The issue is more complex than just broadcasting the truth, TRUTH is not “News & Analysis” media tends to go well beyond socially accepted norms. It is media’s responsibility that “facts should be told without any dilution” keeping in mind that they have no control on who is watching, it could be 90 years old man or a 10 years old child with impressionable personality, people in the end will always draw conclusion based on their previous believes, but noting but truth be told without wrappers of analysis and speculation under the cloak of FREEDOM of SPEECH.

    comment-bottom
  27. avatar
    Akmal Ijaz Warraich(Phularwan,Sargodha) Says:
    November 7th, 2009 at 12:47 pm
    comment-top

    First if we remind the meaning of media in our mind and then we observe the recent role of media specialy in our country(Pakistan) then it will clear that media is also involve in act of terrorism( use of power and spread terror). I will agree with media if it will effort for integrity. Because our country has need of only one thing and that thing is integrity.

    comment-bottom
  28. avatar comment-top

    Wow!! Looks like the freedom loving media have also realised that the idea of freedom of speech is a flawed one and limitations are always neeeded.

    Its so strange when islamists say that everything should be moderated according to islam these same media tycoons scream that this is violation of freedom, but now they themselves have realised the idea of freedoms is a flawed myth!!

    comment-bottom
  29. avatar comment-top

    The only way out to control journalism and media trials is to enforce the law of damages and defamation by our courts and to try such cases speedily. How come our media persons become matured overnight by self restraint
    by showing terrorism, their meetings and interviews with terrorists, their unconfirmed reports and their emotional bursts against political leaders. Our media has become a vogue media. All our private TV channels unconciously help terrorists to serve their cause of terrorising people of this country by giving much air to news which aim at encouragement of the enemies of Paksiatn and demoralising those who love Paksitan. It is also very astonishing that media which always enjoy to criticise others can not bear a slight critism upon itself. When during a parliamentary debate some parliamentarians objected to media’s role the media persons joined hands to rebuke such efforts in a very ugly fasion. This shows the immaturity and lack of sagacity on the part of these anchors and media men who are used to arrange their “baithaks” every night in prime time and mock our leaders to whom we have given mandates, in otherwords these media gatherings mock us “the awam” and indirectly scorn us for our wrong decision of voting them.

    comment-bottom
  30. avatar comment-top

    Suicide terrorism and militant raids hit Pakistan since early 2006, and now these media folks realize that gore on TV is a bad thing. Now its too late now to pursue these guidelines.

    comment-bottom
  31. avatar
    Ahmed Jamil Khan Says:
    November 6th, 2009 at 8:25 pm
    comment-top

    As I read and think more about the root cause of our media dilemma, it appears to me that after the gag for years the freedom of last few years has unfortunately also brought commercial pressures. This is probably one of the major factors for sensational coverage and bit of negativity (being negative is easy) additionally due to this years of gag we have not produced professional anchors and mature critics, at present there is little difference between a typical taxi driver and most media anchors, but I guess this is improving and we have to be positive. It is great to see that our public sentiment has been felt by media and it is not long when politicians will also feel this sentiment via the airwaves, although major parts of our population might be illiterate but they are not deaf or blind.

    comment-bottom
  32. avatar comment-top

    It’s a right decision that the media managers have taken own their on. Had such a decision been taken by the Government the media would have taken it otherway round:restriction on free media. It’s good our media has realized sensivity of the matter. Though late but it’s better come late than never.

    SHAHID HUSSEIN QABOOLPURIA,
    LAHORE, PAKISTAN

    comment-bottom
  33. avatar comment-top

    In this case its not too late and the media has finally woken up to its social responsibility. This code of conduct needs to be revisited time and again to ensure that it is reponding to the dynamic political and security environment of Pakistan.

    What is further required by the media outlets is to be neutral in their approach rather than the sensationalism that they are propogating to get ratings and advertising (which advertiser wants to be associated with grim news coverage anyway? apparently many!)

    We dont want baby FOXES in Pakistan ;)

    comment-bottom
  34. avatar comment-top

    I think that this new policy taken up by the independent media should be encouraged and supported for a variety of reasons.

    Firstly, let me answer this question of why was such a policy taken up so late…
    Most people heading television channels today come strictly from a background in print journalism and therefore they had not been exposed to Western style broadcasting techonogy and television ethics . They needed their fair share of time to learn from their mistakes and it is great to see that they have.

    Those comparing our media to that of USA and India fail to understand that electronic media industries in those countries have now come of age, but yet they are littered with unnecessary bias and journalistic inaccuracies. This is best demonstrated by the media coverage in these countries about the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts and the Mumbai attacks in India. Their journalistic discrepancies need not be repeated here.

    Its glad to see that our media did not repeat these mistakes at the time of assassination of Benazir Bhutto, or the GHQ siege, etc.

    When it comes to taking the government on task for security failures, our media, i believe has been forthright and well focused, for which it shall be praised.

    As it goes about displaying of gory images and disturbing violence on TV, as i have said before, television journalists required time to learn from their mistakes…..

    Comparing our media from its counterparts in the West and in India, i believe Pakistan’s media scene has been reasonably robust, uniformed and well maintained!!!

    comment-bottom
  35. avatar comment-top

    I feel the Pakistani media has realised it much faster than Indian media. During Mumbai attack various channels vied with each other in showing the movement of commandos giving the Controller of terrorists good opportunity to prolong the seize and inflict heavy damages. The Pakistani media has acted in restraint. India has a lot to learn from the army operation of Pakistan. Recently many channels accompanied the para military units sent to control the Naxals. But foolishly Indian media gave all details for the Naxals to attack the para military forces. Hope other nationals and media will learn appropriate lessons from India and Pakistan media exposures

    comment-bottom
  36. avatar comment-top

    I think its a good step by media. Although its too late but viewers will welcome it with good disposition.

    comment-bottom
  37. avatar
    Aftab Kenneth Wilson Says:
    November 6th, 2009 at 7:13 pm
    comment-top

    What is a right way or what is a wrong way to cover all terror news are well known by our Media Houses and those who are related with them. The point is here that who gives them the authority to suggest our Foreign Policy and for that matter some of our sensitive matters. All Sub Judice matters are debated openly in the media, why, is there any ground work being prepared for some one stepping in? Who are pulling their strings ? the so called Intellectuals be wise with your country. Dont give any lending hand to any one, rather come up with an idia of exposing all not one or few people. Bring into picture everyone, right from 1950. Dont spare anyone. Stop following the tune of Flute.

    comment-bottom
  38. avatar
    Amir Khan Mohammed Says:
    November 6th, 2009 at 6:23 pm
    comment-top

    Mr. Niaz

    What exactly is positive about Pakistan for media to report?

    If New York has the highest crime record — that is because even a pickpocket or a small mugging incident is reported and recorded. How many murders are reported in Pakistan let alone pickpockets, robberies and muggings. You would be a laughing stock if you compare yourself to USA and India.

    Any media report shold be factual and truth based on established facts and nothing but that.

    comment-bottom
  39. avatar
    Ahmed Jamil Khan Says:
    November 6th, 2009 at 5:47 pm
    comment-top

    It is certainly a good step forward, the next stage for the media is to give positive image of the country as much as possible, just like in India country or system is not trashed for sake of discussion, there are many in Pak media who have titles like Dr & Prof. etc but unfortunately they play on words for their viewership and confuse already distressed public. I am not saying the media should lie to public but a balance is required, if there are killers among us then there are many more life savers also, people who give blood and selflessly help in crisis, it is time that media focus on these aspects and tell a more human story rather that total political reporting.

    comment-bottom
  40. avatar comment-top

    Yes it may seem too little too late but it is still a step in the right direction.

    comment-bottom
  41. avatar
    Niaz Mohammad Says:
    November 6th, 2009 at 5:31 pm
    comment-top

    To me this is just a face saving move by the TV channels. New York has highest records of crimes, Afghanistan is practically ruled by warlords/Drug dealers, extremism in India is one the high in the world but their media behaves and not make a BIG stories, by provoking agitation, of such things. Hence media in Pakistan makes no less efforts to destabilize Pakistan. They don’t prefer to air positive image. Shame!

    comment-bottom

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment