Comments on: Is Tendulkar a match-winner?

By: Tamil Arasan

Tamil Arasan — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Sachin have his best permanence and record against the Australian team and the best part is during his era the Australian team was a world beaters and they had the histories best bowlers Sharne Warne and Macgrath in that period…

Cricinfo says: “Tendulkar’s Test average in Australia is marginally higher than his average against them at home, while six of his ten hundreds against them have come in Australia.”

His average in Australia – Matches:16, Runs: 1522, Average:58.53, Hundred: 6/ Fifty: 5

How can people say Sachin plays well only in Sub-continent pitches after seeing his record in Australia…

By: nilesh

nilesh — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

very wise man with balanced view.sachin is no.1 match winner of world

By: dil pakistani

dil pakistani — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

tendulkar’s quality is nothing but a myth which is purely false . he is an average player . as a batsman, gilchrist was far better than him .
anyone ,with long period of time like tendulkar , can do better records than him .

By: Srikanth

Srikanth — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

I never expected such a thoughtful comments from the otherside of the boarder. My perceptions about pakistani people needs to be changed.
In my opinion, becuase of his records, we expect sachin to each and every match, however being human its simply not possible. BTW, there is a proverb which says “trees which has ripened Fruit will getting the beating with stones”. Hope you inderstand what it means.

By: Zeesjan ahmed

Zeesjan ahmed — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Yes,he is a match winner he has lots of man of the match but Indian bowling not good that’s why India lose many matches it’s not a sachin Falt he is a best batsman of the world

By: Abdus-Salam khattak

Abdus-Salam khattak — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

it,s depend upon the match situation, but in my eyes tandulkar not match winner but he is a star . He’s a legend and his records say it all

By: Tariq

Tariq — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Tendulkar can only be remember for records he made and for his humble nature, but not as successful captain and winning player, i afarid. Ganguly is much better in winning as captain and as a batsman also.

By: adil raool

adil raool — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

w8 guys let me tel u the truth abt shoaib

By: abuwajeeh hashmi

abuwajeeh hashmi — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

he is a record breaker but not a match winner . I do respect his cricketing spreading over 2 decades.he is undoubtedly an outstanding cricketer of his times.

By: ANEES LOKHANDE

ANEES LOKHANDE — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

It is a fact that Sachin is a destiny boy rather than a genius. Many a time he was pure failures but got ample opportunities, whereas other batsmen one or two failures got them out of the Cricket Arena. When Sachin faced Waqar, Imran, Wasim, they were not at their peak and most of the time he avoided to face Wasim and Waqar and whenever he faced them he did not score big. To me Sachin is an average batsman, who got lot of chances and luck was with him. I think Vivian Richard will be written as the greatest exponent of Cricket game owing to his uniqe style, grace and technique. Though Sachin has the highest centuries under his belt, but he is not in the class of Vivian Richard. It is only media hype which makes Sachin a great.