Comments on: In the best interest of the nation?

By: Nasah (USA)

Nasah (USA) — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

The way the ex prime minister Gilani was mistreated and disrespected by by the judicial bench — it is a good idea for PM Ashraf to refuse to appear before the bench invoking executive privilege.

By: Abid Ali

Abid Ali — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

The laws must be designed by the parliament with the cooperation of the SC as reviewing and advising institution. The Supreme Court is against the contempt of court act 2012 which is understandable. But the disqualification of premier is the purely political motive and it is a very dangerous move in the given circumstances.

By: Sanjay

Sanjay — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Regrettably Pakistan has traded a government “of the Army, for the Army, by the Army” for a government “of the Judiciary, by the Judiciary, for the Judiciary”. what is needed is a government “of the people of Pakistan, by the people of Pakistan, for the people of Pakistan”. Once this is done, Pakistan will achieve its potential and we will have peace on this sub continent.

By: Abdur Rahman Abid

Abdur Rahman Abid — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

It’s is a day light reality that our judiciary is revieving the political traditions founded by justice munir and nourished by moulvi mushtaq . all of them r sacred and any remark or comments about them becomes the contempt of the court , while there is remarkabale difference between the conduct of the judge and court , a judge who biased , favouring some one or haveing a set agenda is actually himself contempting the court , unfortunately all these judges who served under the dictator and gave him three yeras to get three years extension in age limit for the judges , they are simply serving as custodian of nonsence , in line with malignant media who are searching another
is there anybody who can prove that contempt of court is islamic.
A judiciary which is trying best to save the cj’s son and blanket out his corruption , a cj who don’t knows what is his son’s business while living in the same house , a cj who don’t knows who is sponsoring his foreign tours , he don’t have any right to be in that chair , if he is so much interested in politics we welcome him to resign and jump into parlimentary politics , rather than he should keep eroding the democratic system because it is crystal clear that any parliment is soverign to frame a law not the judiciary ,
we strongly condem the misconduct of judiciary against our elected parliment , it’s people’s right to elect the parlimentatrian and the parlimentarians have to frame the laws according to the wishes of the people , not the public servants like judiciary and other organs of the state

By: Abdul Waheed

Abdul Waheed — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

The biggest Badmash is General Iftikhar-ul-Haq, the rebirth of General Zia. Both made huge damages to our country.

By: Abdul Waheed

Abdul Waheed — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

I agree that General Iftikhar-ul-Haq is playing politics and trying to grab powers of Presidency, Chief Executive, Parliament and bow down President Zardari. It looks that Nawaz Sharif has committed with him that he will be made President.

By: Abdul Waheed

Abdul Waheed — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Many legal experts including Aitzaz Ahsan are of the view that the present SC is making judgements which are above the constitution. SC with the help of some lawyers (who are earning fees in crores and professional litigants financed by Nawaz Sharif) is pushing the weak PPP government to tight corner but our concern is that this tussle is damaging the economy of the country leading to sufferings for the poor. Where is merit in Dr. Arsalan case?

By: mir aftab

mir aftab — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

The dare-devil CJ has taken strength from removing a PM and a military dictator (ex-Army Chief) and is now the virtual head of Pakistan Establishment. The only way out is that Parliament is supported by all elected parliamentarians unanimously in their own interest and in the interest of the future of the country. If parliament wishes it can resubmit the contempt law with a new new and suitable amendments that they all agree upon.

By: jalaluddin S. Hussain

jalaluddin S. Hussain — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

We, Pakistanis ,must allow both the national assembly/provincial assemblies and the Supreme Court to play its respective roles. The function of the elected assemblies is to discuss and write laws, in the best interest of the nation, while the Supreme Court must play its interpretive role.

.All the laws written by our members of national and provincial assemblies, must be in accordance with the principles of the Constitution of Pakistan. Both organs of the State of Pakistan must play their roles in the greater interest of Pakistanis and within the constitutional limits.

By: Syed

Syed — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

and then what? ask me, anything but thig Govt. is fine, bring back musharraf if you want to !!! who cares, this country is in limbo because of current Govt. SC is only resisting the “badmashi” this country is subjected to.